🦦 Nikkor 70 200 F4 Vs F2 8

^{Given the specifications, I doubt that this lens will match the 24-70 F4's IQ at any focal length, for starters the older lens takes larger filters (72 vs 67), suggesting at the very least, better corners at the wide end especially at large apertures. I see the 24-200 as an f/8+ lens.} ^{Tamron wide open at 200 2.8 is sharper than Nikon 70-200/4 VR at f4. I am replacing the holly trinity Nikon with Tamrons, so far I have the 15-30 VC and 70-200 VC, I don't feel like I need a 24-70 anymore, just a 50mm prime in between is okay. I also have both the Tamron 15-30 and 70-200 2.8 VC. Both awesome lenses and the 70-200 must be the}

Macro. The 70-200mm ƒ/2.8 is not a macro lens by any stretch: just 0.18x magnification and a minimum close-focusing distance of 1.4 meters (4.6 feet). It's worth noting that this minimum close

Fast aperture, f/2.8 zoom features VR II image stabilization, ED glass and Nano Crystal Coat. Excels at low-light sports, fashion, portraits and more, An update to Nikon's legendary f/2.8 fixed aperture telephoto zoom lens, the AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II captures stunning full-frame images with remarkable speed.

It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject. Has rounded aperture blades. Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS. Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS. Similar to the number of aperture blades, rounded blades affect the way the light gets through to the sensor.

The 24-70 f/4 is a wonderful lens. People have a tendency to dismiss it because it is available as the "kit" lens which traditionally are not that good. In this case, I'm amazed by what we are getting with the Z system. Both of the S lens trounce the F-mount versions and the new f/2.8 is sharper than the f/4 version wide open AND at f/4.

. 38 334 67 97 187 58 67 329 237

nikkor 70 200 f4 vs f2 8